A Reflection on Finsterbusch

AReflection on Finsterbusch



AReflection on Finsterbusch

Part1 Summary

Pamelastone shows a definite setting of challenges facing the femininegender within a modern society. Pamela stone presents a new model asa reference to the modern woman generation. The context of thediscussion focuses on the evident change within the modern society.Pamela’s arguments focus on the shift of roles within the familyunit. According to Pamela, the comparison scale is between the secondand third wave version of a woman’s role in the family and withinsociety. Pamela explains that the change challenges originated fromfamily tradition portraying restricting bands. Pamela elaborates anexisting distinction between collective decisions to quit careers bysuccessful women. As such, the author provides an exemplary case fromRegina. Her case is a decision between working and caring for anewborn baby. Pamela’s example of Regina’s circumstantialdecision challenges a common myth on traditionalism and femininemystique.

LindaHirshman presents a definition of a feminist perspective withreference to the traditional family setting. The author presentsdifferent models that illustrate women prioritizing work over familyresponsibilities and parenthood. Linda’s article “Homebound”illustrates the changes in the gender balance within the society. Thearticle criticizes the gender balance with fundamental justificationof broken marriages. Linda explains the changing traditions withinthe family unit as a result of women empowering cases. According toLinda, the changes in family settings originate from modernism wherewomen largely dominate job markets. According to Linda, the elitewomen engage in numerous professional commitments that challengefamily values and responsibilities. The two articles by both Pamelastone and Linda Hirshman present divergent views on woman`sperspective with reference to family responsibilities. The twoarticles provide detailed research on specific approaches to thechallenges between work demands and family responsibilities(Fisanick,2008).

Part2 Critique

PamelaStone presents coherent arguments based on first accounts ofindividual stories. The fundamentals of her argument entail detailedresearch on exemplary scenarios by other individuals. Pamela’sarticle discusses Regina’s case as a discussion forum that presenta practical experience for first-time mothers. The context justifiesthe author’s eventual assumption and findings. Pamela’sapproaches justify exceptional research work supported by challengingdecisions within a feminine perspective. Pamela evidence on theeventual assumption is reliable to a certain degree(Stone,2011).Individual experiences may generate a unique platform to gaugecertain decisions on the feminine perspective. Other experiences areunreliable as individual decision may appear personal based on firstaccounts.

LindaHirshman provides reliable information based on secondary sourceswhere the author quotes newspapers. Linda uses the New York magazineas a reference platform gauging the latest research on elite women.The author obtains evidence from thorough research work based onacademic statistics. Linda arguments originate from elite men andwomen with reference to the transformations within the family unit.Linda provides a historical transformation with reference to womenempowering. As such, the author uses credible source arguing from adurational revolution. Linda illustrates the changes within thesociety while depicting challenges couples face as a result ofemployment opportunities. The author criticizes other research workby professors like Myra Hart from Harvard Business institution. Theuse of such critiques shows a detailed research work based oninterpersonal observations. Linda provides convincing argumentsdeveloped from immediate resources and evidence-based data.

Part3 Opinion and recommendation

Thecontemporary family unit undergoes a systematic change originatingfrom marriage misunderstanding. The origin of parenthood failuresdevelops from divided attention by the elite women. The notion ongender balance interferes with the societal setting and demands ofparenting with reference to woman`s roles. The contemporary societydemands a woman’s participation in a parenting role. Pamela’sapproach on the definition of woman`s role mandates an entireparticipation. This perception is a general societal view thatdevelops over generations. As a recommendation, Pamela’s opinionlimits other alternatives to providing for low or average classfamily. Some women prefer engaging in full-time duty to cater forfamily needs and would forgo employment to raise a family. As such,women hold diverse views on employment and family responsibilities.An elite population of women in the contemporary society believes inworking to support individual family. Linda Hirshman’s approachesto woman`s empowerment signify the need to amend professional demandswith consideration to family settings. This opinion is a diverseopinion justified to developing traditions that undermine familyvalues. Conclusion

Pamela’sarticle provides an extensive report on a trending tradition of thecontemporary society. According to Pamela, the changing roles withinthe family setting originate from divided attentions betweenprofessional responsibilities and family demands. Linda Hirshmanexplains other tradition developing within the contemporary society.The author illustrates a professional concentration to employmentopportunities as compared to family devotions. The approach on familydimension presents argumentative approaches to justify differentviews within a society or community. The overall view on woman`sempowerment and family responsibilities illustrate a significantapproach to redefine professional provision to encourage family careand parenting.


Fisanick,C. (2008).&nbspFeminism.Detroit: Greenhaven Press.

Stone,P. (2007).&nbspOptingout?: Why women really quit careers and head home.Berkeley: University of California Press.

Stone,P. (2001).&nbspAwoman`s guide to living alone: 10 ways to survive grief and be happy.Dallas: Taylor Trade.

Stone,P. (2009).&nbspLastresort: marriage.Toronto New York: Harlequin.

Stone,P. (2011).&nbspSecondchance dad.Toronto: Harlequin Books.

Finsterbusch,K. (2007).&nbspTakingsides.Dubuque, Iowa: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin.

Finsterbusch,K. (2006).&nbspTakingsides.Dubuque, Iowa: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin.

Finsterbusch,K. (2008).&nbspTakingsides.Dubuque, Iowa: McGraw-Hill.

Finsterbusch,K. (2008).&nbspSocialproblems 07/08.Dubuque, IA: McGraw Hill.

Finsterbusch,K. (2010).&nbspSocialproblems 09/10.Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.