INCREASED VACCINATION AMONG A SPECIFIED GROUP 4
IncreasedVaccination among a specified group
Thereare numerous program planning approaches that can be used by therelevant stakeholders to ensure that the quality of healthcareimproves in a given community. The essence of having variousapproaches is to necessitate the concerned individuals and groups todevise methods to deliver their services properly (Watson, 2011). Inthe event of facilitating increased vaccinations among a specifiedgroup like the five-year, old children mean that a number ofapproaches can be utilized to facilitate the same. The approach thatbest suits such a program is advocacy approach while the leastsuitable one is the apolitical approach. Advocacy approach is thebest in the sense that such a program requires much involvement oflobby and volunteer groups to ensure that everything moves accordingto plan.
Accordingto Edwards et al. (2000), the approach can easily be used to gainfinancial assistance from the concerned stakeholders thus enablingthe vaccination activities to be undertaken on time. The communitieswhose people are being targeted by the vaccination activities aregiven opportunities to participate in the planning anddecision-making activities that permit the progress of the program.
Apoliticalapproach is the least desirable in this context since it basicallydepends on technical knowledge to arrive at its solutions thuscompromising the community`s desire to participate in the wholeprogram (Issel, 2014). It follows that the community members aredenied the opportunity of establishing how the entire vaccinationactivity has to be undertaken due to lack of health and technicalprofessionals among them. Majority of the experts being relied onunder this approach may make the whole vaccination process to be lesssuccessful due to additional expenses incurred in the process. It,therefore, follows that the best approach is advocacy whileapolitical represents a mechanism that complicates the whole issue ofvaccination that is aimed at benefiting the community in question.
Edwards,R.W., Jumper-Thurman. P., Plested, B.A., Oetting, E.R., &Swanson, L. (2000). Community readiness: Research to practice.Journal of Community Psychology, 28(3), 291-307.
Issel,L. M. (2014). Health program planning and evaluation: A practical,systematic approach for community health. Burlington, MA: Jones &Bartlett Learning.
Watson,M. E. (2011). Systems approach workbook for health education andprogram planning. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.