PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND TOOLS A PRAGMATIC GUIDE FOR TECHNICAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1

PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND TOOLS: A PRAGMATIC GUIDE FOR TECHNICAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Frequently the distinction between the extent that succeeds and the extent that fizzles is the initiative of the undertaking manager. Each one task administration group is a gathering of people who needs inspiration and coordination (Mindtools.com 2014). Arranging is imperative, yet the capacity to adjust to changes and work with individuals to overcome difficulties is exactly as essential. An undertaking administrator must ace the abilities that are important to be effective in the earth (Mindtools.com 2014). The special and brief nature of undertakings makes a work environment that commands an alternate administration approach from that utilized by an operations chief.

One approach to enhance understanding of undertaking administration is to differentiation project administration with operations administration. All operations chiefs are accused of proficiently and successfully accomplishing the reason for the association. Ordinarily, directors of financial associations concentrate on boosting benefits and stockholder esteem pioneers of socio-religious associationsfocus on viable and proficient conveyance of an administration to a group or body electorate and legislative administrators are centered on gathering objectives created by government pioneers. For our reasons, each of these directors would be considered the &quotoperations administrator (Mindtools.com 2014)&quot.

More successful work techniques will create a superior item or administration, and a more proficient work procedure will diminish costs. Operations directors investigate work forms and investigate chances to make changes. Operations supervisors are methodology centered, situated to catching and institutionalizing change to work courses of action and making an authoritative society concentrated on the long haul objectives of the association. Regularly, particular activities are attempted to enhance their general operational courses of action.

Operations administrators make a society which concentrates on the long haul soundness of the association and assemble groups about whether to institutionalize and enhance work forms. They hunt down and support colleagues who will &quotfit in&quot and that help both the viability of the group and the group society. Operations supervisors are long haul centered and situated to persistent change of existing courses of action over more times of time.

Project managers concentrate on the objectives of the undertaking.Projectachievement is associated with accomplishing the task objectives inside the undertaking course of events (Anon 2014). Project supervisors apply extend administration devices and procedures to plainly characterize the undertaking objectives, create an execution plan to meet those objectives, and meet the developments and end date of the task. A project director needs an alternate set of abilities to both characterize and effectively execute Project s. Since activities are brief, they have a characterized starting and end. Project managers must oversee start-up exercises and undertaking closeout exercises. The techniques for creating groups, arranging work, and making necessities oblige an alternate set of information and aptitudes in light of the fact that parts of the undertaking administration group perceive that it is brief.

Project chiefs make a group that is objective centered and energized around the achievement of the undertaking. Undertaking allies realize that the task is transitory in light of the fact that theProject, by definition, is provisional. Undertaking colleagues are frequently parts of authoritative groups that have a bigger potential to influence long haul headway potential. They occasional report straightforwardly to the undertaking director and the impact of achievement or disappointment of the task may not influence their notorieties or vocations the same way that the achievement or disappointment of one of their other employment obligations would. Thusly, extend administrators make clear objectives and clear desires for allies and attach project accomplishment to the general achievement of the association.Projectsupervisors are objective guided and point of reference turned.

Technology plays a vital role in the process of project management. Managers ought to be well versed with the best types of technologies to incorporate into their projects, as well as know how best they should be employed. This will greatly aid them in assuring quality, managing risks, and attaining the projects’ objectives (Mochal 2005). This paper is a structured study guide for technical project managers. It gives insight on the best ways to appraise technology and other project management tools for the good of the project at large. The paper looks into three projects, breaks them down, analyses and provides recommendations.

  1. EXAMPLE PROJECTS

    1. PROJECT I

The Project on Remote Sensing Technologies for Ecosystem Management Treaties: A Case Study of Laguna Merín and Associated Wetlands

One of the reasons of the Project on Remote Sensing Technologies for Ecosystem Management Treaties is to educate national offices in Brazil and Uruguay of the utility of remote sensing innovations for helping choice help, settlement checking and trans-boundary preservation (Mickelson 2011). The main part of this task brought about a report reporting the utility of remote sensing for multilateral ecological understandings and trans-limit protection. This report, archives the second part, a pilot application of remote sensing information and systems for Landsat WRS scene 222-83 (Mickelson 2011). This issue captures much of Laguna Merín (LagoaMirim in Portuguese), a vast freshwater lake that straddles the fringe in the middle of Brazil and Uruguay (Mickelson 2011). Field work and adjustment exercises are concentrated on two test destinations: the eastern district of the Bañadosdel Este in northeastern Uruguay and the Arroio del Rei, south of the Taím Ecological Reserve in southern Brazil (Mickelson 2011). These destinations are placed on inverse sides of fringe, inside the southern share of the lake. Items for the test destinations are incorporated inside the complete Landsat scene order.

Foundation/Area of Study

The Laguna Merín (LM) watershed was our peculiarity of investment, however time and asset impediments obliged that that we center preparatory endeavors inside illustrative scene samples from each one side of the global outskirt (Mickelson 2011). Two harshly equivalent 40km x 40km districts, one each on either side of the national fringe separating the lake (Panel 1b) were sketched out for this period of theProject. Occasionally timed field studies led in March and October 2004 centered field surveillance and reviews inside these areas (Mickelson 2011). The trust was that examples aligned inside the symbolism of these zones could be extrapolated to comparative gimmicks inside the bigger Landsat picture. The universal limit in the middle of Brazil and Uruguay analyzes the lake close to its southern half (Panel 1b) (Mickelson 2011). While about 80% of the foot shaped impression and 63% of the coastline of Laguna Merin exists in the domain of Brazil, almost the inverse motion seek the whole catchment emptying into the lake (Mickelson 2011). The greater part, (66%) of the catchment region, is placed inside Uruguay domain with 34% found inside Brazil.

Study Area

A. Southeast limit locale of Brazil and Uruguay.

B. Settled locales: Landsat World Reference System scenes coating LM- Path
ows upper right, 221-22, lower right, 221-23, upper left 222-22 and the scene picked, 222-83(Mickelson 2011). Settled inside are two polygons speaking to 40x40km bi-national study center destinations. Laguna Merin is in the focal point (Mickelson 2011).

Foundation evaluations of the locale were predicated on the longing to secure, comprehend and map the spatial and worldly motion of critical living peculiarities, examples and methods inside the region and also the burdens and dangers to the frameworks. Through ahead of schedule Project gatherings and writing Project s, it was created that one of more essential capacities that the district serves as is a stop-over for transitory water, wading and shorebirds (Mickelson 2011). Also, the wetland edifices found inside this locale help a high extent of the bio-diver.

    1. PROJECT II:On-line Simulations – Advanced Web-enabled services

ABB Process Industries has created a reenactment device called Drive Dynamics Analyzer (DDA) to have the capacity to investigate progress emphasizes in turning machines (Bolin and Borg 2010). A sample of how to utilize this apparatus is building a model for a moving plant drive. The model contains data about the mechanical and electric gimmicks of the motor together with solidness and minute of latency in shafts, couplings, gearboxes, and in the roll (Bolin and Borg 2010). The model is utilized for mulling over wear and tear amid drive. It is likewise used to choose controller parameters for pace control of the gear.

Some information is nonobligatory (e.g. recoil sizes), however it gives essential information for an intensive dissection. With the right enter information, the properties of the driveline might be enhanced before last dimensioning and outline. Likewise the profits of the extraordinary moving plant control capacities might be exhibited to the client. Recreations and recurrence reactions of the driveline can additionally effortlessly be given (Bolin and Borg 2010).

The primary objective of this postulation is to make on-line information correspondence for reenactments, utilizing MATLAB Web Server (MWS), in the middle of ABB and their clients (Bolin and Borg 2010). Designers and merchants at ABB can likewise exploit this application. A vital part is additionally the ease of use of the client interface to minimize mistake and exertion for the customer.

DDA is composed in MATLAB it might be assembled and run as a standard application essentially, however a couple of reenactments are just living up to expectations when DDA runs straightforwardly under MATLAB (Bolin and Borg 2010). Right now the client need to record all the parameters needed for these recreations in paper structure. ABB gets this data and supplements the parameters in the DDA-application. The created result report is come back to the client via mail. With this system one runs the danger of getting wrong parameters and it is likewise exceptionally prolonged. Along these lines ABB needs to modernize the correspondence with their clients. The thought is that the client is going to have an arranged form of the DDA application and through on-line information correspondence with ABB having the capacity to do progressed web-empowered administrations (Bolin and Borg 2010).

The earth, MWS, picked for thisProject is new to ABB SEPID, implying that a piece of this theory is to handle the establishment and design of MWS. The principle subject of this proposition is to add usefulness to the DDA application, keeping in mind the end goal to make it conceivable to run an aggregated rendition of the application without having MATLAB introduced and through a web server where MATLAB is introduced having the capacity to do progressed reenactments (Bolin and Borg 2010). For this reason MWS is given.

The errand is isolated into four sections. The first is to introduce and get the MWS work appropriately and to study the MWS application demo samples after with the establishment. Next step is to make a test program that calls MWS, performs a reenactment and send the result back once more. The third part is to actualize the MWS application into the DDA application (Tutorialspoint.com 2014). After that ease of use is in center lastly a convenience test is arranged.

Issue chain of command

1. Installing and getting the MWS work and study MWS demo illustrations (Bolin and Borg 2010).

2. Make a test program that calls the MWS, does a recreation and send the result back once more (Bolin and Borg 2010).

3. Implementation in the DDA Application (Bolin and Borg 2010)

4. Usability

5. Test

    1. PROJECT III

Bayesian Estimation of Non-Stationary Markov Models Combining Micro and Macro Data

Another Bayesian schema for construing the move probabilities of non-stationary Markov model is created in this paper. Non-stationary Markov models encourage examination of variables affecting the likelihood that an individual will move between predefined states. Information utilized for evaluating Markov models can either be structured information, where the particular development of a single person between states is seen over time, or amassed information, giving just the number of people dwelling in each one state about whether (Mittelhammer, Storm and Heckelei 2011). Emulating Markov wording, we allude to such board information and totaled information as micro and macro information, individually. The general target of our methodology will be to join micro and macro data into a bound together and steady system for assessing move probabilities.

The paper creates a Bayesian schema for evaluating non-stationary Markov models in circumstances where macro populace information will be accessible just on the extent of people dwelling in every state, yet micro-level test information will be accessible on watched moves between states (Mittelhammer, Storm and Heckelei 2011). Back appropriations on non-stationary move probabilities are inferred from a micro-based former and a macro-based probability utilizing conceivably non-concurrent information perceptions, giving a new technique for surmising move probabilities that unites beforehand different methodologies (Mittelhammer, Storm and Heckelei 2011). Monte Carlo reproductions exhibit how watched micro moves can enhance the exactness of back data. It gives an experimental application in the setting of ranch structural change. The project focusses on using all the information available through various technological approaches. The electronic retrieval and saving of data and parameters will be of much importance. There will be developed a computer program to aid in the processing of all the necessary information that will be in accordance with the Markov models (Mittelhammer, Storm and Heckelei 2011). The software will be in the likeliness of SPSS but will be more enhanced to handle the models as they are theorized.

  1. FORMAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT AIMS

Every project is guided by its aims and objectives they are clearly stipulated in the proposal to act as the initial milestones in the implementation of the project. The means determines the end it is therefore important that the project aims are stipulated accurately. The goals ought to be succinct, time bound, realistic, specific and achievable (Anon 2014). In the case of the three case projects in this paper, most of these aspects are deductible.

Project I

The aims of the project are to evaluate the use and impact of remote sensing technologies in the in Uruguay and Brazil (Mickelson 2011). The project is aimed at developing a report that is to be addressed to the relevant governments. This way, they will understand and appreciate the need and usefulness of remote sensing technologies the governments will in-turn promote their usage in areas where they are in limited use. The projects also aim at enhancing the governments’ trans-boundary relations. The postulation of the objectives lay a firm foundation on which all the other activities will be established and executed.

Project II

In this project, the ABB Company aims at enhancing its newly invented Drive Dynamics Analyzer (DDA) technology on the web through the use of MATLAB (Bolin and Borg 2010). The primary objective of this postulation is to make on-line information correspondence for reenactments, utilizing MATLAB Web Server (MWS), in the middle of ABB and their clients (Bolin and Borg 2010). Designers and merchants at ABB can likewise exploit this application (Helsgaun 2009). A vital part is additionally the ease of use of the client interface to minimize mistake and exertion for the customer. In this case, their clients are able to assess and ascertain the efficiency of their machines and motors. This promotes efficiency and effectiveness. The objectives are well laid out. However, it would have been better if a timeline had been accorded to the project’s aims and objectives.

Project III

The paper creates a Bayesian schema for evaluating non-stationary Markov models in circumstances where macro populace information will be accessible just on the extent of people dwelling in every state, yet micro-level test information will be accessible on watched moves between states (Mittelhammer, Storm and Heckelei 2011). Back appropriations on non-stationary move probabilities are inferred from a micro-based former and a macro-based probability utilizing conceivably non-concurrent information perceptions, giving a new technique for surmising move probabilities that unites beforehand different methodologies. Monte Carlo reproductions exhibit how watched micro moves can enhance the exactness of back data. It gives an experimental application in the setting of ranch structural change. The project focusses on using all the information available through various technological approaches. The electronic retrieval and saving of data and parameters will be of much importance (Mittelhammer, Storm and Heckelei 2011).. There will be developed a computer program to aid in the processing of all the necessary information that will be in accordance with the Markov models. The software will be in the likeliness of SPSS but will be more enhanced to handle the models as they are theorized.

  1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOLS

Brainstorming

Brainstorming is generally the first critical imaginative phase of the undertaking administration andProject arranging procedure. See the conceptualizing technique in point of interest and clarified independently, in light of the fact that it numerous other valuable applications outside of task administration (Mochal 2005).

Dissimilar to most extend administration abilities and routines, the first phases of the conceptualizing procedure is preferably a free-thinking and irregular system (Rosenhead and Chapman 2014). Therefore it could be ignored or under-used in light of the fact that it not a common methodology for some individuals whose mains qualities are in frameworks and methodologies. Subsequently this phase of the undertaking arranging procedure can profit from being encouraged by an ally ready to oversee such a session, particularly to help extremely sorted out individuals to think arbitrarily and inventively (Mochal 2005).

Fishbone outlines

Fishbone outlines are mainly utilized as a part of value administration issue discovery, and all hands on deck process change, particularly in assembling and creation, yet the model is additionally exceptionally valuable in undertaking administration arranging and assignment administration by and large.

Inside Project administration fishbone graphs are helpful for right on time arranging, remarkably when assembling and sorting out components, for instance amid conceptualizing. Fishbone graphs are useful for distinguishing concealed components which might be huge in empowering bigger exercises, assets territories, or parts of a procedure.

Fishbone charts are ideal for planning or indicating reliant time-basic components. Fishbone charts are likewise called `circumstances and end results outlines` and Ishikawa graphs, after Kaoru Ishikawa (1915-89), a Japanese educator work in modern quality administration and designing who conceived the system in the 1960s (Rosenhead and Chapman 2014). Ishikawa`s chart got to be known as a fishbone graph, clearly, on the grounds that it would seem that a fishbone:

Ishikawa’s fishbone chart (Rosenhead and Chapman 2014)

A fishbone chart has a focal spine running left to right, around which is assembled a guide of components which help the last come about (or issue). For each one extend the primary classifications of components are recognized and indicated as the fundamental &quotbones&quot prompting the spine (Rosenhead and Chapman 2014).

Into every class could be drawn &quotessential&quot components or elements (demonstrated as P in the chart), and into these might be drawn auxiliary components or variables (indicated as S). This is ruined each classification, and could be stretched out to third or fourth level variables if vital (Rosenhead and Chapman 2014).

The chart above is an extremely basic one. Commonly fishbone charts have six or more principle bones nourishing into the spine. Other primary class components can incorporate Environment, Management, Systems, Training, Legal, and so forth (Rosenhead and Chapman 2014). The classes utilized as a part of a fishbone graph ought to be whatever bodes well for the task. Different standard class sets exist for diverse modern applications, then again it is imperative that your picked structure is ideal for your own particular circumstance, as opposed to taking a standard set of classification headings and trusting that it fits.

At a straightforward level the fishbone graph is an extremely successful arranging model and apparatus – particularly for &quotmapping&quot a whole operation. Where a fishbone chart is utilized for task arranging obviously the &quotImpact&quot is indicated as a point or result or result, not an issue. The &quotIssue&quot term is utilized within deficiency finding and in quality administration critical thinking. Some fishbone charts can get to be exceptionally perplexing in fact, which is regular in specific quality administration ranges, particularly where frameworks are electronic.

This model, and the basic way investigation chart are like the considerably more intricate graphs utilized on business procedure displaying inside regions of business arranging and business process change.

Project Critical Path Analysis (Flow chart or diagram)

`Basic Path Analysis` sounds exceptionally muddled, yet it is an extremely intelligent and compelling system for arranging and overseeing complex tasks. A discriminating way dissection is regularly indicated as a stream chart, whose organization is straight (sorted out in a line), and particularly a course of events. Basic Path Analysis is additionally called Critical Path Method – it is the same thing – and the terms are usually contracted, to CPA and CPM (Rosenhead and Chapman 2014).

A generally utilized apparatus inside Critical Path Analysis is PERT (Program/Program/Project Evaluation and Review Technique) which is a particular system for distinguishing related and reliant exercises and occasions, particularly where a huge task may contain hundreds or a large number of associated components (Muilwijk 2014). Spunky is not regularly applicable in straightforward tasks, yet anyProject of significant size and many-sided quality, especially when timings and interdependency issues are urgent, can profit from the point by point dissection empowered by PERT routines (Muilwijk 2014). Perky investigation ordinarily encourages into Critical Path Analysis and to other more extensive task administration frameworks, for example, those specified here.

Discriminating Path Analysis stream charts are useful for indicating related components whose timings cover or concur. They likewise empower a plan to be booked as indicated by a timescale. Basic Path Analysis stream graphs additionally empower costings and planning, despite the fact that not exactly as effectively as Gantt outlines, and they likewise help organizers to recognize causal components, in spite of the fact that not exactly so effortlessly as fishbone charts (Mochal 2005).

Note that some of these exercises must happen in parallel – and vitally they are associated. That is to say, on the off chance that you attempted to make a broiled breakfast by doing one undertaking at once, and one after alternate, things would happen. Certain undertakings must be begun before others, and certain errands must be finished with the goal others should start.

  1. QUALITY ASSURANCE

5.1 Inputs to the perform quality certification process

  • Venture administration plan.

It is really the quality administration arrangement parcel that is of enthusiasm here as it portrays how the methodology of perform quality affirmation will be completed (Deloitte.com 2014). Likewise of enthusiasm here is the methodology change plan which points of interest how the work is, no doubt performed and what moves may be made to enhance this execution and all things considered is a key data.

  • Quality measurements

Amid the procedure plan quality these were characterized depicting how quality will be measured and may identify with any part of value (Jisc.ac.uk 2014). One is paramount is that every quality metric must be measurable along these lines subtle elements of the sum and units for every metric must be illuminated thus gives a target method for estimation (Deloitte.com 2014).

  • Quality control estimations

These are a yield from the perform quality control process, and comprise of paramount archived estimations of value levels and consistence.

These estimations are determined by examining and checking on all undertaking deliverables to guarantee they conform to determinations, and originating from potential territories to enhance any part of the administration of theProject (Jisc.ac.uk 2014).

  • Work execution data

As effectively expressed, perform quality certification is concerned with procedure change, thus work execution data is a vital include as it will support in distinguishing ranges where process upgrades are required. This information will additionally incorporate data in regards to territories with methodology enhancements have lived up to expectations. In synopsis, the reason here is to alter poor procedure territories and it learning or potentially improve fruitful methodology upgrades.

5.2 Outcomesfrom the perform quality affirmation process

  • Change demands

Since this methodology completes dissection and assessment then it is ordinary to expect that change appeals would be a common result of this procedure, and thusly change solicitations is the fundamental yield. Most change appeals from this methodology would be about procedural progressions.

  • Venture administration arrangement redesigns

As a consequence of this process the route in which theProject is constantly overseen is liable to change. Inside theProject administration arrangement is the quality administration arrangement and the methodology change arrangement and one or both of these two archives are profoundly liable to be upgraded.

  • Task archive redesigns

Progressions to quality can affect pretty much any component of the task including plan, plan, extension, hazard, assets, among others. So hence any specific learning territory and their related arrangements may need to be redesigned as a consequence of performing this methodology.

  • Hierarchical methodology stakes upgrades

These comprise of any benefits which might be utilized for future Project s and all things considered ought to be redesigned at whatever point such practices are executed or undoubtedly if any new data has been scholarly. These advantages are a typical inputs to large portions of the PMBOK forms, and in this way in the soul of general methodology change, it is vital that the yields of this procedure are bolstered go into the authoritative arrangement of benefits (Deloitte.com 2014).

  1. RISK MANAGEMENT

Overseeing dangers on tasks is a process that incorporates hazard appraisal and an alleviation methodology for those dangers. Hazard appraisal incorporates both the recognizable proof of potential danger and the assessment of the potential effect of the danger. A danger moderation arrangement is intended to dispense with or minimize the effect of the danger occasions events that have a negative effect on the undertaking. Distinguishing danger is both an inventive and a restrained methodology (Deloitte.com 2014). The imaginative methodology incorporates meetings to generate new ideas where the group is wanted to make a rundown from everything that could happen. All thoughts are welcome at this stage with the assessment of the plans advancing later.

Risk Identification

A more trained methodology includes utilizing agendas of potential dangers and assessing the probability that those occasions may happen on the Project (Itplanning.org.vt.edu 2014). A few organizations and commercial enterprises create hazard agendas focused around experience from past tasks (Campbell 2014). These agendas could be useful to the task director and undertaking group in distinguishing both particular dangers on the agenda and stretching the reasoning of the group. The past knowledge of the Project group, task encounter inside the organization, and specialists in the business might be profitable assets for distinguishing potential hazard on an undertaking.

Recognizing the wellsprings of danger by classification is an alternate strategy for investigating potential hazard on a task. A few samples of classifications for potential dangers incorporate the accompanying: Specialized, Cost, Plan, Customer, Contractual, Climate, Fiscal, Political, Natural, and Individuals (Campbell 2014).

The individuals’ class might be subdivided into dangers connected with the individuals. Illustrations of individuals’ dangers incorporate the danger of not discovering the abilities required to execute the task or the sudden inaccessibility of key individuals on the Project. David Hillson utilizes the same schema as the work breakdown structure (WBS) for creating a danger breakdown structure (RBS) (Itplanning.org.vt.edu 2014). A danger breakdown structure sorts out the dangers that have been distinguished into classifications utilizing a table with expanding levels of point of interest to the right.

Hazards in John`s Move

In John`s prerogative, John makes a rundown of things that may happen with his undertaking and uses his work breakdown structure as an aide.

The result is a clearer understanding of where dangers are generally focused. Hillson`s methodology helps the task group distinguish known dangers, yet could be prohibitive and less inventive in distinguishing obscure dangers and dangers not effortlessly found inside the work breakdown structure.

Hazard Evaluation

After the potential dangers have been recognized, the undertaking group then assesses the danger focused around the likelihood that the danger occasion will happen and the potential misfortune connected with the occasion. Not all dangers are equivalent. Some danger occasions are more inclined to happen than others, and the expense of a danger occasion can fluctuate enormously (Unodc.org 2014). Assessing the danger for likelihood of event and the seriousness or the potential misfortune to the undertaking is the following Project in the danger administration process.

Having criteria to focus high effect dangers can help contract the concentrate on a couple of basic dangers that oblige relief. Case in point, assume high-effect dangers are those that could expand the task costs by 5% of the theoretical plan or 2% of the definite plan (Campbell 2014). Just a couple of potential danger occasions met these criteria. These are the discriminating few potential danger occasions that the task administration group ought to concentrate on when creating an undertaking danger relief or administration plan. Hazard assessment is about creating an understanding of which potential dangers have the best plausibility of happening and can have the best negative effect on the undertaking. These turn into the basic few.

There is a positive connection both expand or diminishing together—between Projects hazard and undertaking unpredictability. A task with new and rising engineering will have a high-intricacy rating and a correspondingly high hazard. The Project administration group will relegate the fitting assets to the innovation directors to guarantee the achievement of undertaking objectives. The more perplexing the innovation, the more assets the engineering administrator ordinarily needs to meet Project objectives, and each of those assets could face unforeseen issues.

Hazard assessment regularly happens in a workshop setting. Expanding on the ID of the dangers, each one danger occasion is dissected to focus the probability of happening and the potential expense in the event that it did happen. The probability and effect are both appraised as high, medium, or low. A danger alleviation arrangement addresses the things that have high appraisals on both variables probability and effect (Itplanning.org.vt.edu 2014).

Hazard Analysis of Equipment Delivery

A task group broke down the danger of some paramount supplies not touching base to the Project on time. The group distinguished three bits of gear that were discriminating to the Project and would fundamentally build the expenses of the undertaking on the off chance that they were late in arriving. One of the sellers, who was chosen to convey a vital bit of gear, had a history of being late on different undertakings. The seller was great and frequently assumed more work than it could convey on time. This danger occasion (the recognized gear arriving late) was evaluated as high probability with a high effect. The other two bits of gear were possibly a high effect on the task however with a low likelihood of happening.

Not all undertaking supervisors direct a formal danger appraisal on the Project. One reason, as found by David Parker and Alison Mobey in their phenomenological investigation of Project chiefs, was a low understanding of the devices and profits of an organized examination of task dangers (Itplanning.org.vt.edu 2014). The absence of formal danger administration devices was likewise seen as a boundary to actualizing a danger administration program. Furthermore, the task supervisor`s identity and man

  1. PROJECT EVALUATION

These rules plot the reason, methods and prerequisites for the assessment of capital tasks in the Queensland Public Sector. Project assessments of real capital activities are needed under the Public Finance Standard for Asset Management (Sect. 346-7, July 1995), and structure a piece of the systems connected with the State`s Capital Works Program.

The rules will support orgs to assess Project choices in a steady and complete way, and to prioritize contending undertakings. At an entire of government level they give an uniform skeleton to the assessment of capital undertakings in the setting of the State vital arranging methodology.

Government Owned Corporations are not subject to these rules as their financing assessment criteria are secured by shareholding priests popularized elements inside divisions would put more prominent stress on fiscal parts of the Project. These rules blanket the key standards to be connected in the assessment of capital tasks, in any case, predictable with these standards, singular orgs are swayed to create their assessment manuals to address the specific issues and concerns important to every association.

The center of these rules is fundamentally on what is needed for an undertaking assessment as opposed to on point by point portrayals of since a long time ago settled methods, for example, expense profit dissection, for which there is now an extensive variety of writing accessible (see references at the end of these rules).

2. What is undertaking assessment?

Project assessment is a system for surveying the monetary, social, ecological and fiscal effect of proposed capital undertakings. All the effects connected with a capital Project are recognized and, where conceivable, expenses and profits esteemed in fiscal terms, so the activities chose by government will give the greatest net profit to the State.

Financial investigation evaluates the total assets of a task for the economy. It is normally the significant component of an undertaking assessment on the grounds that it gives and intends to rank activities regarding the proficient designation of assets (Unodc.org 2014). It gives a beginning default positioning to tasks which might then be adjusted by investigates of the social, natural and budgetary issues connected with these activities. Hence, monetary dissection is talked about in more prominent detail in these rules than alternate investigates.

Social and ecological breaks down evaluate the impact of the Project on social gatherings, business, local advancement, and so on and on characteristic environments, contamination, legacy, uncommon species and so on. They, additionally, recognize approaches to manage these issues. The degree to which these investigates structure some piece of a task assessment relies on upon the imperativeness of these issues for a specific Project.

The fourth component in Project assessment, plan investigation, gives leaders with data on sources of funding, borrowings, financing sources, and so on so as to survey the budgetary ramifications of the undertaking (Unodc.org 2014). It is needed for all undertakings which impacts on the State Budget. These different examines are then viewed as together, the choices positioned and a favored choice chose.

3. The reason for Project assessment

The reasons of task assessment are to enhance the nature of administrations, to guarantee esteem for cash, and to prioritize proposed capital tasks. This is attained through an organized methodology which makes it conceivable to:

• Clearly characterize Project goals, and consider an extensive variety of alternatives to meet these targets

• Link the Project to the key goals of the administration, the State Capital Works Program and an office`s physical holding key arrangement

• Carry out monetary, social, natural and budgetary dissects of the undertaking and

• identify the net profit of the undertaking to the group, and the impact on the State Budget.

Project assessments support divisions to settle on choices on proposed capital Projects (Jutte 2014). They give the intents to survey the reasonability of proposed capital activities, and to rank contending undertakings in the division`s yearly capital works program. Project assessments likewise encourage thoughts by the Cabinet Budget Committee amid the Budget process. They aid in the determination of activities to be incorporated in the Capital Works.

Costs

The assets delegated to every assessment ought to be equivalent with the size and criticalness of use included. As a significant reason for undertaking assessment is to enhance esteem for cash, the expense of task assessment must be adjusted against the profits of enhanced choice making. The assets assigned to an undertaking assessment ought to be the base important to illuminate chiefs enough of the value and effect of the task (Jutte 2014).

Key customers and stakeholders (e.g. departmental administration, Treasury) ought to be counseled on an intermittent premise to guarantee the assessments are pertinent to customer needs and to evade unnecessary expenses and deferrals.

Timing

In the perspective of the considerable budgetary ramifications of the capital works program, it is crucial that data on the reasonability of proposed capital undertakings is accessible to Treasury and the Cabinet Budget Committee in the advancement of the State Budget. Project assessments for significant capital tasks, to be financed from an office`s capital base and to initiate in the following monetary year, ought to be finished by the commencement of the yearly Budget process (Jutte 2014). The assessments ought to be finished sufficiently ahead of time of the Budget methodology to permit the important time for survey. This applies particularly where there are argumentative issues.

At first, just short-structure assessments are needed for new capital activities. Projects which the Cabinet Budget Committee decides legitimacy further attention will oblige a full assessment to be embraced. These will be then considered by the council later in the Budget process.

The Project Assessment Process

The project assessment procedure includes the distinguishing proof of administration conveyance needs, the posting of alternatives (counting a &quotdo nothing&quot alternative), the social event of applicable information on these choices, nitty gritty investigates of the alternatives, and the choice of a favored choice.

Define the targets and extent of the Project

The administrations to be given by the project must be evaluated and distinguished with a specific end goal to elucidate the reason for the task. This reason might be communicated as a &quotresult&quot (e.g. better recreational access), and as a &quotyield&quot (e.g. fabricate another street). These conclusions and yields ought to infer from the association`s corporate and physical holding vital arrangements. Any capital proposal ought to unequivocally recognize its commitment to a division`s administration conveyance methods.

In deciding the extent of a capital proposal, thought ought to be given to figuring out what constitutes a discrete project, i.e. keep away from unnecessary conglomeration or exorbitant dis-total of capital works segments, and consider the effect on different tasks or associations.

7.2 Identify and select suitable alternatives

All sensible choices ought to be recognized at the early stage in the arranging methodology, including a practical base case alternative of &quotdo nothing&quot or &quotmanage without&quot i.e., keeping up the norm. Different alternatives can include:

• Refurbishing existing offices

• Various choices regarding timing and scale

• Options to lease, fabricate or buy

• Provision of the administration or office by the private division

• Maintenance by the private area

• Various consolidations of capital and intermittent use

• Various areas or site choices

• Co-operation with different circles of government or

• Co-area or imparted offices to differ

The Project Evaluation Process (Jutte 2014)

Identify service need and define objectives and scope

Select and short list suitable options

Economic analysis:assess costs and benefits and determinenet benefits of the selected options

Social analysisEnvironmental analysisBudget analysis

C ombine analyses, rank and select preferred option

Alternatives might be produced by making inquiries, for example,

• Could the operation be scaled down or shut?

• Are all components of the operation supported?

• Could the operation be consolidated or separated further bolstering good fortune?

• Can the undertaking be connected to different tasks?

• Could the operation be incorporated with different capacities?

• Is there a part for the private segment?

• Could the operation or piece of it be contracted out?

• Are diverse sizes or characteristics of operation plausible?

• How can the outline and/or life of the plan be fluctuated?

• Is there degree to exchange off capital and upkeep costs?

• What break results are accessible?

Emulating distinguishing proof and preparatory evaluation of all sensible alternatives, the most suitable choices ought to be short recorded for more itemized appraisal (Budget Division 2007).

Carrying out of the Project examination

To guarantee that all parts of a task are evaluated satisfactorily, the monetary, social, ecological and budgetary effects ought to be explored. The examines of each of these issues, which frequently may be interrelated, are then viewed as together to structure the general dissection of the task. The weight set on each one kind of examination will rely on upon the way of the project (Budget Division 2007).

Economic investigation

Monetary examination evaluates the effect of capital tasks on the economy. The expenses and profits of an undertaking are recognized, esteemed (utilizing appraisals if important), broke down and positioned as indicated by net monetary profit. The two procedures predominantly utilized for financial examination are Cost/Benefit Analysis and Cost/Effectiveness Analysis (Budget Division 2007).

Cost/Effectiveness Analysis is especially pertinent to undertakings with solid group or social welfare targets which may be hard to esteem. It communicates the profits in physical units as opposed to in financial units and would apply, for instance, where the yield of a project cannot be promptly relegated a fiscal quality. On account of the educational requests of Cost/Benefit Analysis, the task and the profits must be of sensible essentialness to legitimize the assets needed for it.

There are five steps in a financial investigation (Budget Division 2007).

  1. Identify profits

In recognizing profits attention ought to be given to:

  • Avoided expenses — costs which are unavoidable if nothing is carried out, yet may be maintained a strategic distance from if move is made

  • Cost funds — evident diminishments in existing levels of use if a task moves ahead

  • Revenues — incomes which come about specifically or in a roundabout way from the task income changes which would have happened paying little respect to the undertaking must not be incorporated

  • Benefits to shoppers, and to the more extensive group in general (externalities) and

  • The lingering estimation of the benefit (if any).

Multipliers, which measure the auxiliary or backhanded impacts of a project on the economy, ought not to be incorporated as profits in a financial examination (Budget Division 2007). The incorporation of multipliers is wrong in light of the fact that any development undertaking will produce action, straightforwardly and by implication. In any case, these could likewise be created by option employments of the stores.

Profits ought to be esteemed in money related terms wherever conceivable, e.g. by utilizing true or assessed business costs. Regularly some notional fiscal measures will be accessible, however in a few cases valuation may be exorbitantly extravagant and the results delivered may be questionable. Thus, associations ought to utilize carefulness as to the value of undertaking such valuations.

(b) Identify costs

Assessments ought to be focused around the extra cost to the State of undertaking the specific project. Costs which would have been acquired at any rate ought to be rejected (Budget Division 2007). The stream of expenses ought to blanket the life of the proposed capital thing. The level of precision in recognizing expenses will differ with the importance of the task and the accessibility of information. Suppositions underlying all capital and intermittent expense appraisals ought to be made unequivocal in the assessment, including presumptions with respect to, for instance, genuine work costs, true vitality expenses, request development or true charges/rates.

It is imperative that gauges of expenses be embraced on a steady premise to empower genuine examinations to be made between contending alternatives and projects. Additionally valuation of expenses ought to be on the same premise as profits (Budget Division 2007).

(c) Calculate net profits

The idea of present worth is utilized to encourage examination between undertakings. For Cost/Benefit Analysis the different future expenses and profits ought to be communicated in present worth terms. For Cost/ Effective Analysis, a present worth ought to be accommodated expenses (Litten 2014). Reducing makes note of the way that starting financing expenses are borne in advance, while profits and/ or working expenses may stretch out far into what`s to come. Marking down reflects the idea of the time inclination of cash which is important even without swelling (Budget Division 2007). The utilization of genuine investment rates, i.e., with the impact of swelling uprooted, for instance, reflects this time inclination.

When in doubt, expenses and profits ought to be esteemed in true terms and the stream of expenses and profits ought to be reduced. Where ostensible expenses and profits are utilized then this ought to be expressed. Ostensible and true qualities ought not to be utilized within the same dissection (Budget Division 2007). The count of present quality obliges the utilization of a rebate rate.

A typical rebate rate is suggested for all offices in the financial assessment of capital activities in the general Budget part to encourage the examination and positioning of tasks inside and between portfolios. All divisions in the general Budget part ought to utilize a test markdown rate of 6% genuine with proper affectability testing, e.g. 4% and 8% (Budget Division 2007). Popularized substances would regularly, ensuing to a financial assessment, embrace a general budgetary assessment of the undertaking which would utilize a proper business rate.

Environmental examination

An ecological investigation is needed for all capital tasks to guarantee that they meet the necessities of the Environmental Protection Acts and other pertinent enactment (Budget Division 2007). The natural dissection may incorporate a preparatory survey to focus the degree and nature of the ecological issues and whether further examination is required, trailed by an itemized natural effect proclamation equivalent with the centrality of the ecological issues and the project.

Natural break down gives leaders with data about the ecological issues connected with capital activities, and ought to additionally recognize methods for managing these issues. The examination ought to evaluate:

  • The degree and nature of both on location and off-site natural outcomes

  • The short- and long haul ecological impacts from the Project

  • Opportunities to enhance natural profits from the project (e.g. through the joining of protection activities) and

  • Whether natural contemplations connected with the project are prone to be of huge group concern.

Where an evaluation affirms zones of huge ecological concern, techniques and choices ought to be created, where achievable, to address these concerns (Jisc.ac.uk 2014). The expenses and profits connected with these techniques ought to then be recognized and esteemed to support in the positioning of alternatives.

Dangers and vulnerability connected with the examination, specifically with suppositions underlying the investigation, ought to be illustrated to help leaders in the general appraisal of undertaking danger (Campbell 2014). The degree and nature of the dissection ought to be comparable with the way of the ecological issues included.

Budget investigation

A financial plan investigation ought to be accommodated within the selected options. This ought to recognize expenses and incomes for every year over the three year forward assessments period, and accordingly as proper. The financial backing dissection of a project ought to framework (Campbell 2014):

• The costs, both capital and repetitive

• The incomes and

• the subsidizing source, including points of interest of any budgetary plans These can all be outlined in even organization, for instance:

All consequences for the State`s Budget ought to be recognized. These include:

• Any plan affects different projects differently e.g. between departmental/ org charging

• Possible consequences for associations` funding including capital and intermittent costs, borrowings and obligation administration charges, duties and expenses and

• Whole of government effects, e.g. on different orgs.

Trade streams ought to be in for cold hard currency current dollar terms, not in &quottrue&quot or consistent dollar terms (which bars the impact of expansion). Note that examines embraced in &quottrue&quot dollars will need to be acclimated to current dollars for Budget gauges. Specific accentuation ought to be given to the beginning three year forward evaluations period. Borrowings and any dangers or instabilities, especially with outside subsidizing sources, ought to be distinguished and portrayed.

Select the favored alternative

Choices ought to be positioned at first on the premise of the financial dissection utilizing Net Present Value or the Net Present Value of Costs as the measuring stick. This encourages correlations on a reliable premise (Campbell 2014). The positioning from the monetary examination ought to then be re-surveyed in the light of the social, natural and budgetary breaks down and the positioning balanced where important, and where the favored alternative contrasts from that chose in the financial dissection, the reasons ought to be expressed unmistakably.

It should dependably be perceived that the most reduced expense alternative is not so much the &quotbest&quot choice the &quotbest&quot alternative is the particular case that most nearly satisfies all administration strategy destinations (monetary, social, ecological) (Budget Division 2007).

  1. CONCLUSION

Project I

The greater part of the scene of the Laguna Merín bowl has been vigorously changed by people over the previous 30 years (Mickelson 2011). Casual examinations of area spread pattern examples, contrasting the 1984 Landsat 5 and the early 2000 Landsat 7 Etm+ symbolism, demonstrated that, inside the two 40 km2 study zones, the foot shaped impression of rice generation has changed little (Mickelson 2011). It gives the idea that this rural manufacture had been finished when the early pictures had been taken. We realize that the district is imperative for occupant and transitory avian groups, particularly the few remaining patches of the non-fragmented environment. The last remaining segments of neighborhood physical and sea-going groups will probably require assurance through the preservation, reclamation and checking of biological systems and living assets (Mickelson 2011).

In light of timely appraisals of the field deliberations, there give off an impression of being a sufficient sum and nature of living space and assets important to help populaces of essential indigenous vegetation and faunal species. Expansive cross-org and bi-national coordinated effort and associations for natural surroundings assurance, protection and rebuilding, if actualized deliberately, can guarantee the long haul wellbeing furthermore practicality of the best of the district`s living assets. Endeavors underway at different levels – including among venture teammates at IBAMA and PROBIDES, and the 2004 between administrative &quotNew Agenda for Cooperation and Frontier Development Uruguay- Brazil&quot which incorporates natural issues – speak to imperative steps for monitoring remainders of the area`s regular natural surroundings and guaranteeing that the zone keeps on supporting occupant and passerine waterfowl, in addition to different types of investments (Mickelson 2011).

The incorporation of technology and computer programs, further, enhances the accuracy of data obtained as well as the final results. The best results are achieved when all the relevant tools of project management are appropriately employed in the strategic implementation.

Project II

The project was to empower an on-line association in the middle of ABB and, in direct, their clients through the MWS in place for the clients and specialists/venders at ABB who are out on occupations, to do progressed figuring and reproductions, without having MATLAB introduced on their machines (Bolin and Borg 2010). This ought to be finished with as a meager adjustment as could be expected under the circumstances in the current DDA.

The necessity was that this association ought to be made simple for the client. The client interface ought to contain as few mouse clicks as could reasonably be expected to guarantee high ease of use and as meager exertion as would be prudent for the client.

The assignment likewise secured to introduce MWS, arrange it in a suitable manner for the errand and conform the parts influenced of the document transmission (Bolin and Borg 2010). The errand has been fathomed utilizing prototyping since it was a suitable method for learning and comprehend the MWS, because of the way that the structure of MWS is making it simple to fabricate a test project (Bolin and Borg 2010). It additionally permits designer, client and client to have a typical comprehension both of what is required and what is proposed.

To outline the proposal, it is considered that it has arrived at its objectives to empower progressed web administrations, with a MWS application, for a customer server correspondence. At last there is trust that the work will be valuable for ABB now and later on (Bolin and Borg 2010).

Project III

In this paper a Bayesian estimation skeleton for non-stationary Markov models is inferred that permits micro and macro information to be joined in estimation to give more exact induction in regards to model parameters (Mittelhammer, Storm and Heckelei 2011). Particularly, it is indicated how a specimen of watched moves between states at the individual level could be actualized as earlier data inside an overall macro information Bayesian estimation skeleton. Besides, the paper proposes two separate models for the determination of the move probabilities relying upon whether the Markov states are unordered or requested, utilizing a multinomial logit and a requested logit model, separately. Conversely prior methodologies for consolidating micro and macro information offered in the writing, the Bayesian schema considered here offers a more general full back data approach for joining micro and macro information built data in light of move probabilities and permits the estimation of useful connections that connection move probabilities with their determinants, notwithstanding not depending on asymptotic properties (Mittelhammer, Storm and Heckelei 2011). Monte Carlo recreations are used to investigate the impact of former data on the back appropriation and the execution of the back mean, which is the generally utilized Bayesian estimator.

Results show that earlier data, as a micro example of information, enhances the execution of the back mean estimator and diminishes the aggregate fluctuation of the back conveyance considerably. This decrease gets to be more imperative, the more Markov states are considered. Reenactment likewise show that the numerical execution of the utilized MH calculation enhances the bigger the measure of the micro example (Mittelhammer, Storm and Heckelei 2011). Therefore former data as an example of micro moves can enhance estimation in at any rate two routes: regarding the correctness of the back data on the parameters of enthusiasm and also the numerical security of the estimation approach.

These discoveries and the proposed methodology are liable to a few impediments. To begin with of all, the considered probability determination is just relevant to the instance of great perceptions, i.e. on the off chance that totaled information is watched for the whole populace over time. For circumstances where amassed information is just accessible from a specimen of the whole populace, there are other probability determinations that might be considered for utilization in the proposed Bayesian system, for example, MACRAE restricted data probability detail. Furthermore, the quantity of parameters that need to be evaluated expands with the quantity of Markov states, frequently restricting the quantity of Markov expresses that might be practically considered in exact applications (Mittelhammer, Storm and Heckelei 2011).

The proposed requested logit methodology addresses this issue since significantly less parameters need to be evaluated contrasted with the normally connected multinomial logit model (Hobson 2008). Other model particulars focused around consistent Markov chains could be created in which the quantity of model parameters is free from the quantity of Markov states (Mittelhammer, Storm and Heckelei 2011). First and foremost endeavors in this admiration are embraced.

In general, this paper helps the current writing by giving an estimation structure that takes into consideration joining together micro and macro information data relating to non-stationary Markov demonstrates in a manner that is steady with entrenched likelihood math and prompts a base misfortune estimator that is focused around full back data (Mittelhammer, Storm and Heckelei 2011). The methodology is applicable for a wide scope of experimental applications in which macro and micro information are accessible and one is intrigued by measuring the impact of elements that cause people to switch between predefined states.

References

Anon, 2014. [Online] Available at: https://www.directives.doe.gov/directives-documents/400-series/0413.3-EGuide-02 [Accessed 24 Aug. 2014].

Bolin, I. and Borg, M., 2010. On-line Simulations – Advanced Web-enabled services. 1st ed. [eBook] Department of Computer Engineering Mälardalen University Västerås, Mars. Available at: http://www.idt.mdh.se/utbildning/exjobb/files/TR0224.doc [Accessed 24 Aug. 2014].

Budget Division, 2007. Project Evaluation Guidelines. 1st ed. [eBook] Queensland Treasury. Available at: http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfiles/eqnotes/PROJGUID.PDF [Accessed 24 Aug. 2014].

Campbell, P. 2014. The Five Best Tools for Quick and Effective Project Management. [Online] NTEN: The Nonprofit Technology Network. Available at: http://www.nten.org/blog/2011/03/02/five-best-tools-quick-and-effective-project-management/ [Accessed 23 Aug. 2014].

Deloitte.com, 2014. Project quality assurance. [Online] Available at: http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_GR/gr/services/enterprise-risk-services/project-quality-assurance/ [Accessed 23 Aug. 2014].

Helsgaun, K., 2009. Ten Project Proposals in Artificial Intelligence. 1st ed. [eBook] Available at: http://www.akira.ruc.dk/~keld/teaching/Projektforslag/AI_Projects.pdf [Accessed 24 Aug. 2014].

Hobson, D., 2008. A Taxonomy of Algorithms used in the ACM Programming Competition. 1st ed. [ebook] Department of Computer Science Rhodes University. Available at: http://www.cs.ru.ac.za/research/g04h2708/project_files/proposal.pdf [Accessed 24 Aug. 2014].

Itplanning.org.vt.edu, 2014. Project Quality Assurance | Standard for information technology project management | Virginia Tech. [online] Available at: http://www.itplanning.org.vt.edu/pm/qualityassurance.html [Accessed 24 Aug. 2014].

Jisc.ac.uk, 2014. Project planning: Quality Assurance plan: Jisc. [Online] Available at: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/fundingopportunities/projectmanagement/planning/quality.aspx [Accessed 24 Aug. 2014].

Jutte, B., 2014. 10 Golden Rules of Project Risk Management. [Online] Project Smart. Available at: http://www.projectsmart.co.uk/10-golden-rules-of-project-risk-management.php [Accessed 23 Aug. 2014].

Litten, D., 2014. Perform quality assurance — PMP Primer. [Online] PMP Primer. Available at: http://www.pm-primer.com/perform-quality-assurance/ [Accessed 23 Aug. 2014].

Mickelson, J. 2011. Final Technical Report on the Project on Remote Sensing Technologies for Ecosystem Management Treaties: A Case Study of Laguna Merín and Associated Wetlands. 1st ed. [ebook] Department of State Grant. Available at: http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/rs-treaties/papers/TechnicalReport_18apr06.pdf [Accessed 24 Aug. 2014].

Mindtools.com, 2014. Project Management Skills. [Online] Available at: http://www.mindtools.com/pages/main/newMN_PPM.htm [Accessed 24 Aug. 2014].

Mittelhammer, R., Storm, H. and Heckelei, T., 2011. Bayesian estimation of non-stationary Markov models combining micro and macro data. 1st ed. University of Bonn: Institute for Food and Resource Economics.

Mochal, T., 2005. Manage quality through both quality control and quality assurance techniques. [Online] TechRepublic. Available at: http://www.techrepublic.com/article/manage-quality-through-both-quality-control-and-quality-assurance-techniques/ [Accessed 24 Aug. 2014].

Muilwijk, R., 2014. Top 5 open source project management tools in 2014 | Opensource.com. [Online] Opensource.com. Available at: http://opensource.com/business/14/1/top-project-management-tools-2014 [Accessed 23 Aug. 2014].

Pm4id.org, 2014. 11.2 Risk Management Process. [Online] Available at: http://pm4id.org/11/2/ [Accessed 23 Aug. 2014].

Rosenhead, R. and Chapman, A, 2014. Project management – free process, techniques, tools, tips and training. [Online] Businessballs.com. Available at: http://www.businessballs.com/project.htm [Accessed 23 Aug. 2014].

Tutorialspoint.com, 2014. Project Management Tools. [Online] Available at: http://www.tutorialspoint.com/management_concepts/project_management_tools.htm [Accessed 23 Aug. 2014].

Unodc.org, 2014. Evaluation and the Project Programme cycle. [Online] Available at: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/evaluation/evaluation-and-the-project-programme-cycle.html [Accessed 24 Aug. 2014].

Unodc.org, 2014. Independent Project Evaluations Step by Step. [Online] Available at: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/evaluation/independent-project-evaluations-step-by-step.html [Accessed 24 Aug. 2014].